From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Removing the python-updates branch [was Re: bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail] Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20161213224739.GA27173@jasmine> References: <20161211181237.24485-1-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161211181237.24485-6-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161211223454.GA9474@jasmine> <871sxem5ix.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87mvg1k2f3.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161212154412.GA25907@jasmine> <87k2b4jhpw.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGvrL-0002so-7O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:47:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGvrI-0005Ld-5o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:47:43 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:48769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGvrI-0005LO-1U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:47:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (static-70-20-200-201.phil.east.verizon.net [70.20.200.201]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 23FE32500D for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:47:39 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k2b4jhpw.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:34:03AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Sounds like we're going down the same road. I've started a branch with > the earlier patch and a few other fixes. Is it ok to overwrite the > existing 'python-updates' branch on Savannah? I'm going to delete that old branch tomorrow if there are no objections. I started it before I knew the magnitude of the work required, and I think it will be easier to start from scratch. --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlhQeocACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi5phAA1bMnFNnj8Cc6vUIkuQup5WHN9MqePw0tkS5IGKGpmh/x+p9TTKqG/PmG bA96lFXD5JMWdwKe0X1xX9Lq0IY+KZnIjMcbwdCNWuPjl2QTKRfIHCuZgxqF3rZ9 +YxrnQLsloE5m5n8LQVLwvcdyeR6hFgcYgNCqPH+XJ++xBu0IBCYC9xR3fpCezdB //oP7o7mJ6dNF48AazLnIGyR2zDRfhge9rdympfXSW/iCYRUfcreZcSqXLssYPYy rT6Q2C+/bSYuFw2IvyiuFCIF62GHDud5vWQPlhonY8E2lBwUIT44qrsKdHsf71En uJXT51Pdvx1xGgalj6SWCKnbAcBinw1VLxIifUt0MmVZKboDc/oE/dxpnWxq0G9v zEmfFvTg6IFTLzs4bUorEUrEO5ANMCFJ5wFPYG+F4mQPlbHEKwG0/ZT/AxP6m22y /5sPs2p2NGgPT6HE7kTXY5yFQZX1FGnrA2yJRtH/iFIOWIki3gllPxoOquva3RVK lfoCWT0de0+QNmav82eL1xnKET6nv+M6H9KgozY/NWZY1rKygOChwZOL1UJC75KX A0+GlOZD5NoPOe3FdZZ5WeNJBZOWtn80MyoJvjjI0bPkecIo4fUlekB8zXzoGu9Q 5DWNefT7lz6sYMA4zp26UErtPfGAaFo+9ixI25qB4f+ilDeXPR4= =bet6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--