From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add seq24. Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:19:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20161205221957.GB1931@jasmine> References: <20161205100229.11347-1-rekado@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cE1cC-0001Fn-Bh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:20:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cE1c8-0008Sl-KV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:20:04 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:53956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cE1c8-0008SK-EQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:20:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161205100229.11347-1-rekado@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:02:28AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/music.scm (seq24): New variable. > * gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch: New file. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register patch. > diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..270abb6 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/seq24-rename-mutex.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ > +The custom mutex definition in Seq24 clashes with the mutex defined in gtkmm. > +This patch renames the custom definition. Should we report this upstream? LGTM