From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] file-systems: Suppress fsck status completion bar.
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:15:09 +0100
Message-ID: <20161107111509.519536fc@scratchpost.org>
References: <20161105125511.29383-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<20161105125511.29383-4-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<87r36owaap.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y40w88g9.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<8760nzy8bj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87mvhb8wpn.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56242)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1c3gxR-0007u3-NC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 05:15:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1c3gxO-00073n-K0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 05:15:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87mvhb8wpn.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi,

why not just use "fsck -t xxx" instead? It will filter out "-C" for fscks which don't support it.