From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qtwebkit. Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 14:45:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20161105184538.GB11070@jasmine> References: <20161028.112601.737405433041352600.post@thomasdanckaert.be> <20161030002214.GA18050@jasmine> <20161102.140509.1673098785705461056.post@thomasdanckaert.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c35yM-0001oK-8y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 14:45:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c35yH-0006yC-Pl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 14:45:46 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:50066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c35yH-0006xc-IV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 14:45:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161102.140509.1673098785705461056.post@thomasdanckaert.be> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Thomas Danckaert Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:05:09PM +0100, Thomas Danckaert wrote: > From: Leo Famulari > Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qtwebkit. > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:22:14 -0400 > > > Is there any official statement from Qt about these "community > > releases"? I see that it is hosted on qt.io, so presumably they are > > somehow blessed by Qt, but I'd like more information. > > I wasn't able to find any information at all. Maybe someone on #kde can > tell us more. I found this statement on the Qt mailing list: "QtQuick1 and QtWebKit are _not_ supported anymore since Qt 5.6. What we have said is that we will provide QtWebKit source packages as courtesy on a best-effort basis. That is, also the QtWebKit source package under http://download.qt.io/community_releases/5.6/5.6.0/ is not part of Qt anymore, and not supported. Use it at your own risk. There's also no promise we can continue providing these." source: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-May/025923.html Well, none of this software comes with a warranty, so I think it's fine. Can you add a code comment mentioning that this package is not officially supported by the Qt project?