From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: Libtiff CVE-2016-5652
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:33:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20161030233359.GA20183@jasmine>
References: <20161029234132.GA23900@jasmine>
 <87h97tsdpi.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45715)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c0zc4-0008Fu-NA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:34:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1c0zc1-0006CL-K1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:34:04 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87h97tsdpi.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:56:41PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> > From 7abe86a8d93e1a1ed11f14ec7ede22ce9b020611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:23:05 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libtiff: Fix CVE-2016-5652.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/libtiff-CVE-2016-5652.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> > * gnu/packages/image.scm (libtiff/fixed)[source]: Use it.
> 
> I’d say go for it.

Pushed to master and merged into core-updates. I kept it grafted on
core-updates, since changing libtiff requires ~1500 rebuilds. Oh well.
It's a good candidate for a post-release "staging" branch.

> 0 days since the last image library vulnerability…

I don't think we'll need 64 bits for this counter...