From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Update sunxi-tools to 1.4
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:28:17 +0200
Message-ID: <20161027142817.2f0504cd@scratchpost.org>
References: <20161026212132.11164-1-dannym@scratchpost.org>
	<20161027062659.GB18185@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46825)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1bzjnI-0003di-MO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1bzjnE-00016d-H3
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:28 -0400
Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:42923)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>)
	id 1bzjnE-00015t-B9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:28:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20161027062659.GB18185@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

> is the change in 'target-tools' necessary for the update or should/can
> it be split out into a second commit?

It should be split out...