From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: Note for Python packages: packages do not have "inputs" (most of
	the time)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:05:27 -0400
Message-ID: <20161025180527.GB4992@jasmine>
References: <580CF174.1000201@crazy-compilers.com>
	<87wpgyonb2.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<580F2A7A.9080406@crazy-compilers.com>
	<20161025124938.GB887@jasmine>
	<580F9D6B.5070106@crazy-compilers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33000)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bz66Q-0007iN-DD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:05:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bz66M-0007R6-Lr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:05:34 -0400
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33284)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bz66M-0007Qk-Et
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:05:30 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <580F9D6B.5070106@crazy-compilers.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:59:07PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 25.10.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> > Changing the subject: Is that branch stable? Can I start testing core
> > Python package upgrades on top of it?
> 
> I worked on this branch, just fixed some last (hopefully) errors and
> IMHO the branch is stable.

Great, I'm going to test a pytest update on top of it (locally). But
feel free to rebase the branch if necessary.