From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Patterson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12]: Add asdf-build-system. Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:17:37 -0230 Message-ID: <20161010151737.7ab16fc8@uwaterloo.ca> References: <20160927041532.27097-1-ajpatter@uwaterloo.ca> <8737k7hu6s.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bteg2-00055z-9e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:47:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btefy-0001o2-Ac for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:47:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8737k7hu6s.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi. On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:00:27 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > I browsed the patch series quickly; the packages I did not comment on > LGTM, modulo the question of whether we should prefix them. Thanks. It looks like there are some suggestions there which weren't covered by the v2/v3 patch series, so I'll work on those when I get the chance. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99.