From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support. Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 16:36:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20161009203640.GA31119@jasmine> References: <87oa2x3rxc.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20161007012854.GB6335@jasmine> <877f9k8bkx.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20161008214708.GA27027@jasmine> <87shs5jtkx.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20161009192019.GB3025@jasmine> <87oa2tjn0z.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btKqE-00078u-BI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 16:37:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btKq8-0004oz-6I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 16:37:01 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:38780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btKq5-0004mN-Ik for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 16:36:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oa2tjn0z.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:16:44PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > Alright. Does this commit message look good to you? > From c08ba395fe1c1df29d8509350ee287c0832a1970 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kei Kebreau > Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 16:10:09 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Update to 2.8.9dev.9 and fix GnuTLS support. >=20 > * gnu/packages/lynx.scm (lynx): Update to 2.8.9dev.9. > [arguments]: Append the path to the GnuTLS to "--with-gnutls=3D". Sure, looks good to me! I didn't test this patch, but I assume that you have :) --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX+qpVAAoJECZG+jC6yn8I1VAP/3XKRaLXrRJkSZ6Sc2zpTjj5 0OFURcyQSwsk7EPJpYO5flSKfY1QKKpofoZDkYUSg4Cm1CdlQf1d/j2OFnJyHsDG FeO/5JGKEj9V6eZoId2kyHqPl0zqO3Tc8T6o1r28X/BoQUuWdgMKzPKTzmvaf9+p hxQz6NsofRqwXb1MrGXs/cu91dGaYEp5nS2y+Xd2FsRyMuliD0tcfBesg1gANToK xtot8k9at/WSngraYXhAvnzRpAYKskhszgKt+Fq6xacI1sYt8UgR9vOuCebPT9Ek FYazIbN20tjEkvnZGBAB3OxIpN+nerzm/KNYWRfNjY2svRGZCUe7UZ9xiNh1giTJ 3SUuhGkjFkqXCFmHJJdFGtBz4H590DwZJ6R6KXVziIqeN4hE6Hec+2PkQGELv13c iTQSSDf++V23SU46thPj34C4CwR9aqkJexecrJKGksHP8gZVnwr0OKWM/+dLvwOV NXyNWi2+4/aoq+qLjRABbMutw+IbPjw30HIDvV3m+rhQ92pIVNST59zmjFdWXuNQ efRkfYsqlJsU9iAqymC7LR79LqVi2LMRNDvmsHkA2HO/3CwU60lLpp285QXVm6MS 6qJVzZuXxRFqSukFJarnrXhysI9X4YO3q8hvWm57Au3WtefvIz7DeBu4Kgl1fod6 SrEDT0TC+vRjnWjziSng =QErw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--