From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support. Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 15:20:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20161009192019.GB3025@jasmine> References: <87oa2x3rxc.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20161007012854.GB6335@jasmine> <877f9k8bkx.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20161008214708.GA27027@jasmine> <87shs5jtkx.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btJeF-0006Hh-5E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:20:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btJeA-0005Yt-Ju for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:20:33 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:52289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btJe9-0005W6-7r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:20:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shs5jtkx.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 01:55:10PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:42:38AM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > >> I get the same problem here. Lynx does mention that GnuTLS support is > >> experimental. Your and Tobias' page work using OpenSSL instead. Try the > >> new patch attached. > > > >> From ee3a889e6902686de4d7c949afcb8cd4a810bd0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Kei Kebreau > >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:36:11 -0400 > >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Support HTTPS (SSL) connections > >>=20 > >> * gnu/packages/lynx.scm (lynx)[inputs]: Add 'openssl' and remove 'gnut= ls'. > >> [arguments]: Add configure flags for OpenSSL support; remove configure= flags > >> for GnuTLS support. > > > > Thanks, this works for me. > > > > I think it's fine to use the "dev" releases with GnuTLS too. Debian and > > Fedora both use them. >=20 > I can confirm that lynx 2.8.9dev.9 works properly with GnuTLS. Should we > use the current stable release with OpenSSL or the development release > with GnuTLS? And if we use the development release, should I submit the > patches as a single version bump with the necessary small adjustments? I would do it all in one: update to 2.8.9dev.9 and correct the configure flags so it works correctly. I think that "update" and "make the updated version work correctly" belong in the same commit since one change doesn't make sense without the other. --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX+phvAAoJECZG+jC6yn8IVkIP/0/kuXOq7UgyOccO5JDpn9VF UR6cVqbrgJAkKvipaEwk7sSuGAssQgo7dfVkbpoBkHT8XNuwPQdYiJOsbMOkMecK F59CAFQRe3cdgJmZ/xbvngfhw0dVBYl1spCAiQclrinNsRg3JGDSFtIMKVi0fu5a Ox7Hfjm3Ox1aGWXptZpgraEXZ0rCyqAdOki2wyTPJT4rfP2+uldsrW5QQ1Ofa5r5 LNxCEZHri3hfePpuhFNC57ZDEjdUUC18xQ0iW/2juZ0JbsgBki9NjPsNPsL4GTXf MpsX0XKDNJxRsGwv4p+aDIhlx0LdSrpXdq0uK49qFJisAFnJMXehRUq5V6xXayd4 A7taWkC4JfKJXB8IZPmVJfNS65muwKs8z7paAOTL86QI8b6D4aA0R33A9MYxq8y1 VvIkbkMTWC8oqWs9LxgEThQ1IIsjbNbZMJA7DPBGXstU1HkpgwQg4fhaKDCxU54e x9N9CyHASuyO4JcI4lQgScLwqO+VgYPzxn6gpsx18lBSibfm2zN7F4JfrFG8V52/ YK3XlgI4ghBORpdAMUSIdJQCn7izR6ab7RygEqsSD7B0SVvgxTAgEG86ay4Vhyhh UOobwAEx0OMfuru/xw1CBH5OOExkMasHRnKok9vBqNy5FOfkL8mj0pQXNYuca7Aj rIg5CjeHPy6N6Q96Y5D9 =EZML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--