Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support.

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1496 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 01:55:10PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:42:38AM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> >> I get the same problem here. Lynx does mention that GnuTLS support is
> >> experimental. Your and Tobias' page work using OpenSSL instead. Try the
> >> new patch attached.
> >
> >> From ee3a889e6902686de4d7c949afcb8cd4a810bd0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
> >> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:36:11 -0400
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Support HTTPS (SSL) connections
> >> 
> >> * gnu/packages/lynx.scm (lynx)[inputs]: Add 'openssl' and remove 'gnutls'.
> >> [arguments]: Add configure flags for OpenSSL support; remove configure flags
> >> for GnuTLS support.
> >
> > Thanks, this works for me.
> >
> > I think it's fine to use the "dev" releases with GnuTLS too. Debian and
> > Fedora both use them.
> 
> I can confirm that lynx 2.8.9dev.9 works properly with GnuTLS. Should we
> use the current stable release with OpenSSL or the development release
> with GnuTLS? And if we use the development release, should I submit the
> patches as a single version bump with the necessary small adjustments?

I would do it all in one: update to 2.8.9dev.9 and correct the configure
flags so it works correctly. I think that "update" and "make the updated
version work correctly" belong in the same commit since one change
doesn't make sense without the other.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]