From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 18:09:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20161008220939.GB27027@jasmine> References: <877f9kufxx.fsf@elephly.net> <87shs7xno6.fsf@gnu.org> <8737k7urk0.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bt7pS-0004WH-Ob for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 02:43:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bt7pQ-0000QW-5K for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 02:43:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8737k7urk0.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:18:55AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Roel Janssen writes: > > Also, I know that Calibre is broken (it compiles file, but it doesn't > > start anymore) since we are missing the QtWebKit module. > > Yet another package for which we would need to decide: remove the > package or add “qtwebengine”. I don't know anything about qtwebengine besides what's in this discussion but, based on that, I think we should package qtwebengine if Calibre requires it. As far as I know, there is no program that can replace Calibre's ebook conversion and formatting tools.