From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL security updates
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:51:17 -0400
Message-ID: <20161006215117.GB5213@jasmine>
References: <20160926170138.GA7875@jasmine> <20161005234628.GB17110@jasmine>
	<87d1jdi790.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35312)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bsGZr-00076L-Hl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 17:51:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bsGZl-0007JF-0j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 17:51:42 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87d1jdi790.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:53:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openssl: Update replacement to 1.0.2j [fixes
> >>  CVE-2016-7052].
> >> 
> >> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl): Update replacement to 1.0.2j.
> >> (openssl-1.0.2i): Replace with...
> >> (openssl-1.0.2j): ... new variable.
> >
> > Ludo, you mentioned you were using this graft as a test case for
> > improvements to `guix lint`. Let us know if you are done with it so it
> > can be ungrafted on the core-updates branch.
> 
> Go ahead, I’m done!
> 
> What I meant by “test case” is just commit
> 8389e6f06efde73ebb849a82e0967eb6afec8c39: now the replacement is called
> “1.0.2j”, not “1.0.2h”.

Ungrafted with 1d8de185b80958cbb0c10621e1dd790aa327064b !