From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add inputs for xonsh. Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:39:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20160929213958.0d05c1ed@scratchpost.org> References: <20160929105016.15727-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20160929164424.GA22100@jasmine> <20160929210808.3015d799@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51349) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bphBj-0003F3-D2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:40:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bphBe-0000bt-Ga for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:40:11 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:44729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bphBe-0000bc-A2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:40:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160929210808.3015d799@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Oops, I don't think the xonsh tarball contains the docs. In which case we need neither sphinx nor numpydoc. Strange, does it have online-only docs? Or do we need another tarball?