From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sdcc. Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:45:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20160927184524.GA6016@jasmine> References: <20160927174026.26800-1-david@craven.ch> <20160927180155.GH2569@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boxNr-0000pl-M2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:45:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boxNo-0006X6-VS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:45:39 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boxNm-0006Pk-Mu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:45:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:15:33PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > > This URL returns 404. > > thanks! missed that due to caching - again. > > is it ok in it's own file? or should that file be renamed to > microcontroller.scm? If we don't already have an appropriate module, then it's a matter of taste :) microcontroller sounds like a useful module name.