From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gnu: make-u-boot-package: Add files-to-install argument. Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:39:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20160926143926.14eccdc3@scratchpost.org> References: <20160926103447.31830-1-david@craven.ch> <20160926103447.31830-5-david@craven.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boVC5-0004bL-4V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:39:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boVBz-0006AL-1t for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:39:36 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:39812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boVBy-0006AF-RM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:39:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160926103447.31830-5-david@craven.ch> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi David, On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:34:46 +0200 David Craven wrote: > (define-public u-boot-vexpress > - (make-u-boot-package "vexpress_ca9x4" "arm-linux-gnueabihf")) > + (make-u-boot-package "vexpress_ca9x4" "arm-linux-gnueabihf" '("u-boot.bin"))) > > (define-public u-boot-malta > - (make-u-boot-package "malta" "mips64el-linux-gnuabi64")) > + (make-u-boot-package "malta" "mips64el-linux-gnuabi64" '("u-boot.bin"))) > > (define-public u-boot-beagle-bone-black > - (make-u-boot-package "am335x_boneblack" "arm-linux-gnueabihf")) > + (make-u-boot-package "am335x_boneblack" "arm-linux-gnueabihf" '("MLO" "u-boot.img"))) ^^^^ Ughh... are we sure we want to do that? I don't think a regular user would know what to put there. If the U-Boot build is from a clean slate it's not like there are stray files lying around or anything - we can just copy them all if we want. Also, I don't think that we will have these define-public things for different systems in the long run. I posted a generated patch adding *all* of the supported U-Boot systems and Ludo vetoed it (and I agree by now - it's not necessary). My preferred approach would be to allow the user to put the following into /etc/config.scm : (bootloader (u-boot-configuration (device "/dev/mmcblk0") (package (make-u-boot-package "malta"))) (Nothing was left off) What do you think?