From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Definite article in synopsis Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:53:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20160924025319.GA12311@jasmine> References: <20160921105951.GA22975@jocasta.intra> <20160923001551.GE12170@jasmine> <6d27b754-5fa2-1fda-8d0a-431ef224b7ef@uq.edu.au> <20160923051017.GA17132@jasmine> <87eg4af2v5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnd5s-0003U4-7C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:53:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnd5o-0001GJ-4D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:53:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87eg4af2v5.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:28:14AM +0900, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I would tend to think of ‘master’ as the branch for non-functional > changes like this. But the key is to make sure such wide changes are > kept in a single branch to avoid merge issues as you wrote. > > WDYT? To clarify, for this case I think it's not a problem to make the change. At most it's only ~40 packages, and that's only ~1% of all our packages :)