From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Danckaert Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add gctp Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:49:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20160924.214956.2240292588360339390.post@thomasdanckaert.be> References: <20160718214723.GA449@jasmine> <20160915.190808.526226800252619989.thomas.danckaert@gmail.com> <20160924010825.GA13078@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnsxm-0007A9-81 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:50:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnsxh-0001Mp-Vs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:50:17 -0400 Received: from s01.spamexperts.axc.nl ([159.253.0.153]:35204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnsxh-0001Hp-P4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:50:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160924010825.GA13078@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: leo@famulari.name Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add gctp Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:08:25 -0400 >> + (version "2.0") >> + (source >> + (origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri "https://github.com/OkoSanto/GCTP/archive/v2.0.0.tar.gz") > > The only thing I would like to change is this mismatch between the > version and the tarball name. Can we call it version 2.0.0? > > Also, we should add a (file-name) field so that the downloaded tarball > has "gctp" in the name. > > I can make these changes locally if you think they are okay. Of course, go ahead! Thanks for reviewing the patch(-es). Thomas