From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 42/42] gnu: Add darcs.
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:48:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20160923134850.GB9220@jasmine>
References: <20160918161022.26135-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160918161022.26135-42-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160921014449.GA18022@jasmine> <20160923001232.GD12170@jasmine>
	<87y42j569q.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44243)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bnQqd-0006IT-W2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:49:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bnQqa-0003zA-49
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:49:03 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42764)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bnQqY-0003uX-Ud
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:49:00 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87y42j569q.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:12:33AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> I also think for reference we should keep the versions of packages it
> needs as they are so many. On the other hand hackage keeps the list of
> dependencies and versions of those, so... should I send a patch removing
> these comments?

I think it's better to say how to learn that information. What's there
now will become obsolete sooner or later, and it's not clear to me how I
could update the information.