From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.61.0. Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:27:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20160921172733.GA7544@solar> References: <8737kw2tp8.fsf@gnu.org> <871t0g2o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <20160921161131.GA3358@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlJ9-0000cs-VJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:27:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlJ5-0004PY-Ox for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:27:42 -0400 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:13852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmlJ5-0004PQ-8H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:27:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160921161131.GA3358@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:11:31PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > boost has quite a few dependencies, as Ricardo already pointed out, and in my > experience tends to be a bit fragile. So maybe the best option would be to > create a boost-update branch and have it built on hydra to see whether there > are problems. It not, one could then cherry-pick the commit to master. I replied before reading all the messages in that thread. Of course if Eric has tried the commit locally and tested that nothing breaks, this could be pushed to master directly. Andreas