From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:02:02 +0300 Message-ID: <20160918210202.GA853@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <87a8fddnyi.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r38ndfwb.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913170529.GD20731@jasmine> <87k2efd6gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913193906.GC31892@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <874m5jcz8w.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160918083656.GA4235@solar> <87wpi9geag.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160918205634.GA11923@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bljED-0007Er-6B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:02:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bljE7-00080g-BN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:02:20 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:58532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bljE7-0007vT-3b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:02:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160918205634.GA11923@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 04:56:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 04:10:15PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > > Andreas Enge writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:37:35PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > > >> In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package in = qt.scm > > >> instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested? > > > > > > since it is used for only one package and relies on the deprecated qt= @4, > > > I would leave it private, regardless its name. > >=20 > > It seems that there are conflicting opinions here. :) > > If no one minds, I can support this feature out-of-tree until GNU Octave > > updates its UI to use Qt 5. > >=20 > > Opinions? >=20 > I don't think we need to keep it out of tree. >=20 > I agree with Andreas that we should discourage use of Qt 4, but I don't > think we should not use it at all, or else I would have suggested > removing all Qt 4 related software. >=20 > I think that if there is a reason to export the package at this time, we > should do so. Otherwise, I think we should keep it private. If we need > to export it later, we can. >=20 > Efraim, do you have a use for a Qt 4 variant of qscintilla? Nope. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX3wDKAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TS/cP/2k9pRsCbDY7tLB2SyP53kYu RYFZwDMkMDGPm/VyXe75JTr42NuLbPzxGdbDajUpvn5SVmNlFOR6ck0rItxQKwQa 0rawkuKxEzcpuwvWkOmbB+xyMAtDhMBWv5vd4rWbJpQ8FjfCyas9+GdckMqFxC+U w8gCxCZVKK/+RzaIPZJCLF/FYDHRpM5TeU4EortoIYrq2A1kiBhT5TV1cijNDQye bV9468+MLIK990R+qgdGNLmQpMaaT6bE7BFfn6dYnEDk6ukNwCFzh95yhY8FozH3 mhjyglESaF6kf0q+/dVozDda5FvHInXQneMI3YGUizap6doOLckr5pTzR9WXQvZ9 SmY6fxT6iZwYmG+LIvc7Hv7LsyLCNoYBdlHATruhPSC6MZ+R80Fz8RnSC1nJRHY6 YzWGGcZX/F1P2r0kBvG4jXIFTIg/qvyRgCS4sAEl+XWBkOw+iv3HTU+UX+f1Creo WJVzgInkUhtl63wVGIHMFaiml2BuFrrwx58TvaidwiiHsig/yQq0HnTftvF17cMi jItzwuGR1kuSkuxt6vE03cz9NSLIb+zOXK1MeQSMmY1aHl+jbpdmOoUTnXXVMNsn odeaNy50+RmDxlVWTh2kaRjEMFJFXtycUpHEU/k2tz7k0FIGpDUMufsaDIyWmNLP QHZssevvr4DhRKgHHGIH =vmJ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--