From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add microcom Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20160913175013.GA32237@jasmine> References: <1473613018-22728-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> <20160913153617.GA13516@jasmine> <20160913173749.GA25835@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjrqo-0002UT-Ip for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjrqk-0004GR-U3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:50:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160913173749.GA25835@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:37:49PM +0200, John Darrington wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:36:17AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 06:56:58PM +0200, John Darrington wrote: > > + (license gpl2+))) > =20 > My interpretation of the first paragraph of COPYING [0] is that the > package is licensed under the GPL version 2 only. What do you think? >=20 > All the .c files in the package explicitly say "either version 2 of the L= icense, > or (at your option) any later version". Okay, I guess the statement in COPYING [0] can be interpreted to not exclude distribution under later versions. It merely confirms that you can distribute under version 2. [0] All files included in microcom are distributable under the "GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE version 2". (Some might have the "or any later version" phrase; this doesn't affect the previous statement though.) If the file doesn't specify a license explicitly, assume "version 2 only". The "GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE version 2" is appended below. --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX2DxRAAoJECZG+jC6yn8IdNIQAI3e5vy5SZRtZWTtQooxI1TB snlr1Qok5LuMTJZow2J4MK1riqiREb9EGCioZjbxvcAks9VY4HBSfpx7Af/cuqTK 0zBv+QUeRvb98EJC8D8xN/2ZeoJ1QoIdwzOK/BZhDRd9IWc+v4TeZeA89ZzxCzil qSekhy+cP8wAzp7tTuHvJR6okaQUKOgIKlH+r/oW0SsnHDyp2WB0viNonFWaW6Gm k3Mvo78Db700EziLAGjpH95M+zVcBugbimdF5sDcBmhS+P6bsAIPSjy9Pgl0QwIQ 108CV34zlNX0ZMjKhGUWKp0KaGx3kGSWrHU82EveIrVuV7RG43FckNlMsGQCzQ/U nO5AlSlq7GGEYApSaWhyA4ZE2ESN13+DGCtZmLPyW7pfbNPwJdXURXdB5yDwFOmi +BzZKg06S2nzs0rEfTWIaQobqbZG8ukcZ/7Rqeb02iG6/MBuq/HXx4MqY9BaEqxD Mx8mJIAvjWpWQXcs+2SfY5Lyci+3h5f8JQM0zXVAd9oigXoIkw62Xe191V8d9ZQa A77k/IxqsrKSanH7AoGCViKGrZnby14frOE1QPOlwvzIPzEvfJwp1uTuPyXO0OkG cSG2YJnyx/pg1yZlXu7XKiQ+J/G7VkXpnP754YIuhZQBgCRGn62njwEYcfw9pulE iV4pJOaCevUHf4Yz5QiD =k6VI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--