On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:36:17AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
     On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 06:56:58PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
     > * gnu/packages/microcom.scm: New file.
     > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
     
     > +    (version "2016.01.09")
     
     I think we should use the upstream tag, "v2016.01.0".
     
     > +    (source (origin
     > +              (method git-fetch)
     > +              (uri (git-reference
     > +                    (url "git://git.pengutronix.de/git/tools/microcom.git")
     > +                    (commit "caf3687611ca855b4fa80c2a9a2fbb020834fc4e")))
     
     Then, you can use the tag name as the commit. The tag I mentioned is
     equivalent to this commit.

I will do that.  Thanks.
     
     > +    (license gpl2+)))
     
     My interpretation of the first paragraph of COPYING [0] is that the
     package is licensed under the GPL version 2 only. What do you think?

All the .c files in the package explicitly say "either version 2 of the License,
 or (at your option) any later version".
     

J'

-- 
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.