From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: r-curl: Respect CURL_CA_BUNDLE variable. Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:45:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20160913054538.GA11067@jasmine> References: <20160907145659.7543-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjgXW-0001JQ-Cy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:45:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjgXS-0000w0-7m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:45:49 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjgXR-0000t7-1C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 01:45:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160907145659.7543-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:56:59PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/web.scm (r-curl)[arguments]: Add phase > "allow-CURL_CA_BUNDLE". > --- > gnu/packages/web.scm | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/web.scm b/gnu/packages/web.scm > index 87bc3e2..321a250 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/web.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/web.scm > @@ -3168,6 +3168,19 @@ applications.") > (base32 > "1p24bcaf1wbfdi1r9ibyyp0l0zp4kzs4g3srv8vikz93hycm1qa6")))) > (build-system r-build-system) > + (arguments > + `(#:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + ;; The environment variable CURL_CA_BUNDLE is only respected when > + ;; running Windows, so we disable the platform checks. It seems like a weird restriction. Could you see what the upstream maintainers think about making this change?