From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add acme-client.
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 14:42:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20160911124216.GA32146@solar>
References: <cover.1472827750.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<f1649dd9aafe811c930ddaca825dbffe82e20818.1472827750.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<57C9BE93.7090206@goebel-consult.de>
	<20160902185028.GB31756@jasmine> <20160903100413.GA6340@solar>
	<20160904022912.GB30856@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46271)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bj45a-0004Hb-Aj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 08:42:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bj45V-0000AD-9l
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 08:42:26 -0400
Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:15980)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1bj45U-00009Q-SF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 08:42:21 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160904022912.GB30856@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@goebel-consult.de>

On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 10:29:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > Is there other reasonably widely used software with this name? Our package
> > guidelines say to use the upstream name.
> 
> Here is what I found:
> 
> https://github.com/kristapsdz/acme-client
> The program I have proposed to package.
> 
> https://github.com/unixcharles/acme-client
> Written in Ruby. Appears active.
> 
> https://github.com/kelunik/acme-client
> Written in PHP. Appears active.
> 
> https://github.com/zero11it/acme-client
> Written in Java. No recent activity and only 8 commits to the Git repo.

Maybe one solution would be to call the first program "acme-client",
and, if it ever gets packaged, the second one "ruby-acme-client" and so on?

Andreas