From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib. Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 14:16:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20160910181609.GA30696@jasmine> References: <6004b842-2434-9cdc-7a31-04231eac5941@uq.edu.au> <87k2f957wt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8760qr5o8n.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87eg5e4g4r.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160824172608.GA24668@jasmine> <878tvm2ddh.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87mvjuz5ae.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160831190908.GD12396@jasmine> <874m5ps1zk.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87k2ekq6jt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bimpE-0000ne-CJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 14:16:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bimp9-00007p-Oq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 14:16:23 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bimp8-0008VY-Hh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 14:16:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k2ekq6jt.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: > > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > >> Changing the subject, you could disable the tests per-architecture. Look > >> for uses of current-target-system and current-system for usage examples. > >> But this is not absolutely required, IMO. > > > > This latest patch series now disables tests on a per-arch basis. > > > > There may be others on MIPS failing after the timeout, but extending the > > list should be obvious. > > Here are the patches again, with the "failing-tests" variable renamed to > "disabled-tests". Let me know if I can provide anything else. Thanks! Looks reasonable to me. Does anyone else have any comments?