From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:47:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20160906174755.GA17204@jasmine>
References: <idj4m5yiwb8.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87y43albe9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160902201422.GA3701@jasmine>
	<8737lhm6rk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160903140613.GB12802@jasmine>
	<87oa45jblg.fsf@gnu.org> <20160904022049.GA30856@jasmine>
	<87h99uw0ea.fsf@gnu.org> <20160905230546.GA9527@jasmine>
	<87shtdrz37.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54398)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bhKTp-000137-2e
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:48:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bhKTk-0004XE-6H
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:48:16 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87shtdrz37.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:29:16PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:35:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Seems like most of the arguments and phases are shared with ‘openssl’,
> >> right?  What about using ‘substitute-keyword-arguments’ to reduce
> >> duplication?  Or are you concerned about potential breakage when one
> >> series or the other changes?
> >
> > I've attached an updated patch using 'substitute-keyword-arguments'.
> >
> > BTW, my previous patch made a one-line change to 'move-man3-pages',
> > deleting the leftover empty man3 directory in the main output after
> > copying the manpages to the 'doc' output. Is this change desired?
> 
> Sure.  Perhaps you can commit this part to core-updates?

Done!

> > From 83405a4ea3628cababd2ee5904c8d0628a002d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> > Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:07:29 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openssl-next.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl-next): New variable.
> > * gnu/packages/patches/openssl-1.1.0-c-rehash-in.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> 
> LGTM, thank you!

Pushed! Thanks for the review :)