From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add rpc-daemon service
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 16:54:35 +0200
Message-ID: <20160903145435.GA1561@jocasta.intra>
References: <1472884782-27956-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<871t11kr86.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40325)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1bgCLF-0001bn-CK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 10:54:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>) id 1bgCLD-0007Ap-CG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 10:54:44 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871t11kr86.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington <jmd@gnu.org>


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 04:11:53PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:

will do.
    =20
     > --- /dev/null
     > +++ b/gnu/services/nfs.scm
    =20
     Missing license.

ok.

    =20
     Also, the preferred way now is to expose service-type objects and not
     provide procedures like the one above.  So you can omit this procedure
     and instead make sure to #:export (rpcbind-service-type).

So what do I then put in /etc/config.scm ?
When I make your suggested change, I get this error:

 ./pre-inst-env guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm
guix system: error: failed to load '/etc/config.scm':
/etc/config.scm:60:24: In procedure #<procedure 4a4df00 ()>:
/etc/config.scm:60:24: In procedure module-lookup: Unbound variable: rpcbin=
d-service

    =20
    =20
     If you=E2=80=99re willing to play a bit, it would be nice to have a sy=
stem test
     that spawns a GuixSD with this service, and then makes sure that, say,
     the =E2=80=98rpcinfo=E2=80=99 program is able to connect to the daemon=
=2E  But that=E2=80=99s
     bonus.  :-)
    =20
Are there some examples of existing system tests?

J'
    =20

--=20
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encryted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20
fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlfK5CsACgkQimdxnC3oJ7MAoQCfQxCcjrpDZQEcBPp7QGNE4f26
NToAn38fGOs+jqJkMuuwUZlwb5m7J8Jo
=8r2X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--