From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] gnu: Add arduino-libraries. Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 22:40:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20160831224037.15db17bf@scratchpost.org> References: <20160830190155.11668-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20160830190155.11668-2-dannym@scratchpost.org> <871t14bt16.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfCJR-0003lr-L6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:40:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfCJN-0000b4-Fl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:40:44 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:33687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfCJN-0000aX-6H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:40:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871t14bt16.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org > As this is only used by =E2=80=9Carduino-libraries=E2=80=9D and probably = no other > package I=E2=80=99d move this into the definition of =E2=80=9Carduino-lib= raries=E2=80=9D. I suppressed arduino-core in this patch series. It will be used by others. > Could you expand the description a little? Maybe one more sentence. What should I write? Would "There are libraries for Ethernet, GSM, LCD, SD drives, servos, stepp= er motors, TFT displays and WiFi. " be OK? > > + ;; libraries/Ethernet/src/utility/w5100*: lgpl2.1 =20 >=20 > Only 2.1? Or is a later version okay? Only 2.1. > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/arduino-libraries-hardware-remove-__c= xa_guard_acquire.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/arduino-libraries-hardware-re= move-__cxa_guard_acquire.patch =20 >=20 > Please add a comment at the very top of this patch to explain what its > purpose is. "Removes function-static variable. Our avr-gcc chokes on it otherwise." ?