From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: tor: Update to 0.2.8.7.
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:24:36 -0400
Message-ID: <20160826232436.GC8782@jasmine>
References: <87y43mnesb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160824201254.GA22720@jasmine>
	<87h9a7zu1n.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87a8fzokyg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45006)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bdQUW-0006wo-Ns
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:24:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bdQUR-00039v-S6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:24:52 -0400
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54598)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bdQUQ-00039F-II
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:24:47 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a8fzokyg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:58:47AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/scripts/maint/checkOptionDocs.pl.in
> 
> I think this perl script is not even used in the standard check phase.
> Maybe it is used in the full-check phase, which we might be able to add
> once we have all the applications this phase requires (stem, and some
> more) if we want/can run test-full.

If we are able to run the full test suite, and the full test suite needs
Perl, then we can add it. Otherwise, I think it's fine to leave Perl out
of the Tor package definition.