From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add libtsm. Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:22:43 +0300 Message-ID: <20160824182243.GC29043@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <20160822193347.GB24639@jasmine> <20160822210848.GA30208@jasmine> <20160822215201.GB9557@jasmine> <20160823010926.GA10679@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bccpF-0007wx-Jx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:22:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bccpB-0000Ub-D7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:22:57 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:32994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bccpB-0000TV-6E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:22:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160823010926.GA10679@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:09:26PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:04:01AM +0200, David Craven wrote: > > Can I get some feedback on this email? Is it appropriate? >=20 > I guess the email looks good. I would rather ask some licensing experts > before taking this to the author, who probably intended to release the > code as free software. >=20 > By the way, Debian seems to think the file is also covered under the > BSD-2: > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/libt/libtsm/libtsm= _3-1_copyright >=20 Of course "I AM NOT A LAWYER" but if we play parsing games, then "A B C and D" reads all or none, "A B C and/or D" can be one, some or all, or none. Either way, to me, the first reads that you have permissions for all of A..D, and the second as you have permission for each of A..D. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXveXzAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TuFwP/0E6MxJM1t8vhaT7EHuwxS92 k26uXBPrif4tESQf3cx4FoOnZeRVW+CKorJX9Xsz3BAt84zxBrhnZkUtFnYxcsFU ylk6VLo1QYp9pWt1lh7FOW0t36RjpFDnIPhwzUHEyG5ST5IyDRTqR5R4YkjmITzs veADRgAr/ginOIv0mCrdGxi7Mbd3+1OArJDU1pQB0siDU1I1RQmPAKbuAquxCs9v 4YppknjC7WuuJ4tKi1Z8T/CSNP8mL9Ta7a95vi8c8ux2NvkoFcpeZbvAdxksKJJR 3oLdNVYGqIJbkkixcESbPvR9AqAtwnRJnmk+K6dB7PU17/Z/Th/IEZTyvIbKV/Eh PhHU4gFWMVHO97njmgkAQbPrICjPWO8Fz3Zxwcg6MFw8s/CnDTVi61AKSg5AIAFl d+5LL9gB9rxa8zHCNxZ0qe2DRn/0fRYEnwL79tydpO487p/60eEo/9ZMJNPcFbZ5 jV8bwwElfPjpWzgGgxjZpcgw4xQRIvQsZ6AMo1NyeP2m270K+rsUhmGScERLe5Px tSbggkWFucGdOSWm38Xuyignnq+KdqnMp2jD+09G99O5QFbNQrx1XUc6y/CfgWFI aPGxDCrfhXIcYm6vb7Nq72YheHUhp2Rv8t1VcCzEv0gU4uav5L7S0GMbZSCWIhO+ ssB7EzPUcCghSwDmRO/A =hIwO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nmemrqcdn5VTmUEE--