[PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.

[PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 132 bytes --]

In the commit message, is the ending "in gnunet-gtk" unnecessary? It
almost feels like it.
Thanks for merging the libunique patch.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-gnunet-gtk-Add-libunique-support-in-gnunet-gtk.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1265 bytes --]

From 71c7fa15df9793827e93823eb37c35b4357626cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:13:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.

* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add libunique.
[arguments]: Add "--with-libunique" to #:configure-flags.
---
 gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
index 7887322..b08ba74 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ services.")
                 "1p38k1s6a2fmcfc9a7cf1zrdycm9h06kqdyand4s3k500nj6mb4g"))))
     (arguments
      `(#:configure-flags
-       (list "--without-libunique"
+       (list "--with-libunique"
              "--with-qrencode"
              (string-append "--with-gnunet="
                             (assoc-ref %build-inputs "gnunet")))))
@@ -335,7 +335,8 @@ services.")
        ("gtk+" ,gtk+)
        ("libextractor" ,libextractor)
        ("glade3" ,glade3)
-       ("qrencode" ,qrencode)))
+       ("qrencode" ,qrencode)
+       ("libunique" ,libunique)))
     (native-inputs
      `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
        ("libglade" ,libglade)))
-- 
2.9.3


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 70 bytes --]


-- 
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.

[Leo Famulari]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:21:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> In the commit message, is the ending "in gnunet-gtk" unnecessary? It
> almost feels like it.

Yes, I think it's unnecessary, so I removed it.

> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.
> 
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add libunique.
> [arguments]: Add "--with-libunique" to #:configure-flags.

Thanks, pushed as d8bc4729f8!