From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add libtsm.
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:52:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20160822215201.GB9557@jasmine>
References: <20160822135307.789-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160822193347.GB24639@jasmine>
	<CAL1_im=uoMXArWq9eYZhbDuti+H1_pmnTEP0fCF2r=wjWy3Cvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160822210848.GA30208@jasmine>
	<CAL1_immabGbpDdwbfea_rm8fYn=kxWctbL2zpLoW4Cpd8g+=Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44596)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bbx8j-0000Es-6B
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:52:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bbx8e-0003wb-33
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:52:17 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:45602)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bbx8c-0003vk-TX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:52:12 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immabGbpDdwbfea_rm8fYn=kxWctbL2zpLoW4Cpd8g+=Sw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:46:55PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> >> How do I figure out what kind of license they are?
> >
> > I usually do a web search on a sentence fragment.
> 
> That works very nicely. Thank you!
> 
> What do I do if someone removes a word from a license text? :/
> 
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software
> for any purpose <with or> >and< without fee is hereby granted, provided
> that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear
> in all copies.

The new license bars us from redistributing the code for a fee? If so,
does that count as free software?

> > I also noticed some public domain code. I didn't do a thorough check.
> 
> What is considered a thorough check? Looking at each source file could
> take hours on a larger codebase...

Sometimes it takes a while...