From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH][core-updates] gnu: gnupg, libgpg-error updates rebased Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:55:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20160819045500.GA24932@jasmine> References: <87vayyccrn.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87bn0q3ozz.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160818185430.GA27805@jasmine> <878tvtyj1p.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1babpy-000701-Sj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:55:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1babpu-0000OV-PK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:55:21 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:33193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1babps-0000Mw-N9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:55:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tvtyj1p.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 07:27:14PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 06:34:24PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > >> GnuPG 2.1.15 has just been released, but please apply this patch, I'll > >> have 2.1.15 ready later and send a separate patch of it based on this one. > > > > I applied your update patch for libgpg-error, but I rewrote the gnupg > > update patch from scratch. > > > > So, no need for a "gnupg: Update to 2.1.15" patch. It's already done. > > I'm not so sure. My build of it failed when the tests happened, which is > why my patch included a fix for that: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01276.html Ah, you're right. Can you send a patch for core-updates?