From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add re2.
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:37:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20160818203745.GC2393@jasmine>
References: <87eg5qgp2r.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160816175910.GB1260@jasmine>
	<87r39nzntl.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60582)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1baU4g-0005jK-FH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:38:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1baU4Z-0003GJ-Rp
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:38:01 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:50173)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1baU4Y-0003FF-Hz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:37:55 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87r39nzntl.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> 
> >> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does not
> >> fully implement PCRE so pcre.scm seems inappropriate. Perhaps that could
> >> be renamed to regex.scm or similar.
> >
> > The patch looks good, but please put it in regex.scm! But, I don't want
> > to move all the regex packages into this new regex module. Perhaps tre,
> > since it appears to have no users in our tree.
> 
> Moved to regex.scm. Thanks!

Thanks, pushed as dc253bf0a5!