From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib. Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:45:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20160816234507.GA24224@jasmine> References: <87twengmbh.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87a8gexyrz.fsf@gmail.com> <87oa4ugsi4.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160815201528.GA23963@jasmine> <87a8gd22ug.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160815222840.GA10735@jasmine> <4752bc68-5466-6c26-a7b4-e53aec400ff5@uq.edu.au> <8760r10z7n.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20160816204736.GA25753@jasmine> <993034f9-ceae-525f-01b9-0b8af7a5aafe@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZo2q-0006Ez-QT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:45:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZo2n-000523-Ky for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:45:20 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:59901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZo2m-00050a-Ae for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:45:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <993034f9-ceae-525f-01b9-0b8af7a5aafe@uq.edu.au> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:31:11AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > > > On 17/08/16 06:47, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:45:16AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > > I initially made this package on a foreign distro without "lapack" in > > > inputs and have verified that dropping LAPACK makes the tests pass. > > > > > > I also found some other optional dependencies after digging around the > > > source, as well as a recommendation to disable/enable asserts: > > > > > > http://dlib.net/dlib/config.h.html > > > > > > Ben, Leo: Can you try the following patch and see if that works for you? > > Yes, this patch builds for me. > Me too, although it appeared non-deterministic. I'm afraid I haven't time to > see if this patch is suitable to push just now. Leo? How did it appear non-deterministic to you?