From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/24] gnu: gstreamer: Add qt-gstreamer.
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:08:03 -0400
Message-ID: <20160816210803.GD25753@jasmine>
References: <20160816183938.22794-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160816183938.22794-16-david@craven.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58432)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZlav-000053-Jt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:08:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZlap-0005Ae-9f
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:08:20 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:52811)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZlan-00059G-0X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:08:15 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160816183938.22794-16-david@craven.ch>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 08:39:30PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (qt-gstreamer): New variable.

> +       #:validate-runpath? #f))

My understanding is that if the runpath validator fails, then something is wrong with the
package. Why is it disabled here?