From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] gnu: polkit-qt: Use modular qt.
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:00:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20160816210059.GC25753@jasmine>
References: <20160816183938.22794-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160816183938.22794-13-david@craven.ch>
	<20160816211756.578d5b26@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57109)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZlU2-0005nT-OZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:01:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZlTx-0003vt-Rg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:01:14 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:46101)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZlTw-0003si-Lw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:01:09 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160816211756.578d5b26@scratchpost.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, David Craven <david@craven.ch>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:17:56PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> > -     `(("qt" ,qt))) ; qt-4 according to the pkg-config files
> > +     `(("qtbase" ,qtbase)))
> 
> That won't be qt-4 anymore. Is that OK?

It won't have been using qt-4 anyways, since the qt variable has always
been qt@5. qt-4 was added after qt@5.