* [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
@ 2016-08-13 1:31 Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-13 12:57 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Jeffers @ 2016-08-13 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 152 bytes --]
When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted,
should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate
like this?
Dylan
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: python-pypump.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2073 bytes --]
From 05af66570794e80b4e8ce2447152eba251d67759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dylan Jeffers <sapientech@openmailbox.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:26:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pypump, python2-pypump): New
* variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 6ff1c5c..2f67ab7 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2016 Sou Bunnbu <iyzsong@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2016 Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Dylan Jeffers <sapientech@sapientech@openmailbox.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -9852,3 +9853,34 @@ etc.")
(package
(inherit base)
(name "ptpython2"))))
+
+(define-public python-pypump
+ (package
+ (name "python-pypump")
+ (version "0.6")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump")
+ (commit "6b612a7ed3c5a9b0a0190f3999fcddb851d1900f")))
+ (file-name (string-append name "-" version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0xy9kw54a2dasc5jig1rmllwv6y3pngbw8pvi0yx2qfpswgr5qbg"))))
+ (build-system python-build-system)
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)))
+ (inputs
+ `(("python-requests" ,python-requests)
+ ("python-oauthlib" ,python-oauthlib)
+ ("python-requests-oauthlib" ,python-requests-oauthlib)
+ ("python-dateutil-2" ,python-dateutil-2)))
+ (home-page "https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump")
+ (synopsis "Python Pump.io library")
+ (description "PyPump is a simple but powerful and pythonic
+way of interfacing with the pump.io API.")
+ (license gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public python2-pypump
+ (package-with-python2 python-pypump))
--
2.7.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-13 1:31 [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump Dylan Jeffers
@ 2016-08-13 12:57 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-13 19:32 ` Dylan Jeffers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2016-08-13 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dylan Jeffers; +Cc: guix-devel
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:31:29PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted,
> should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate
> like this?
For patches that depend on each other, sending them as a "patch series"
will communicate the dependencies and ensure that they apply properly.
If you've made your patches on a branch besides master, you can do:
$ git format-patch -n master
... and attach those patches to an email.
You can also use `git send-email`, which uses `git format-patch` but
will also send the patch series if you set up SMTP and configure Git to
use it.
Can you resubmit these two patches using that method? Normally I
wouldn't ask you to do that but, in this case, this patch does not apply
cleanly after having applied the patch for python-requests-oauthlib;
they both have the same leading context:
> @@ -9852,3 +9853,34 @@ etc.")
> (package
> (inherit base)
> (name "ptpython2"))))
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-13 12:57 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2016-08-13 19:32 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-13 23:07 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Jeffers @ 2016-08-13 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1202 bytes --]
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 08:57:00 -0400
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:31:29PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> > When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted,
> > should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate
> > like this?
>
> For patches that depend on each other, sending them as a "patch
> series" will communicate the dependencies and ensure that they apply
> properly. If you've made your patches on a branch besides master, you
> can do:
>
> $ git format-patch -n master
>
> ... and attach those patches to an email.
>
> You can also use `git send-email`, which uses `git format-patch` but
> will also send the patch series if you set up SMTP and configure Git
> to use it.
>
> Can you resubmit these two patches using that method? Normally I
> wouldn't ask you to do that but, in this case, this patch does not
> apply cleanly after having applied the patch for
> python-requests-oauthlib; they both have the same leading context:
>
> > @@ -9852,3 +9853,34 @@ etc.")
> > (package
> > (inherit base)
> > (name "ptpython2"))))
>
> Thanks!
Thanks for getting back. Here is the series!
Dylan
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pypump.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4847 bytes --]
From 536a71345f1b96905c430850bdb78b83fd6b3c5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dylan Jeffers <sapientech@openmailbox.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:23:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add python-requests-oauthlib
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-requests-oauthlib,
* python2-requests-oauthlib): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 6ff1c5c..a7e5d42 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2016 Sou Bunnbu <iyzsong@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2016 Troy Sankey <sankeytms@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
+;;; Copyright © 2016 Dylan Jeffers <sapientech@sapientech@openmailbox.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -9852,3 +9853,45 @@ etc.")
(package
(inherit base)
(name "ptpython2"))))
+
+(define-public python-requests-oauthlib
+ (package
+ (name "python-requests-oauthlib")
+ (version "0.6.2")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (pypi-uri "requests-oauthlib" version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0ykff67sjcl227c23g0rxzfx34rr5bf21kwv0z3zmgk0lfmch7hn"))))
+ (build-system python-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ `(#:phases
+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ ;; removes tests that require network access
+ (add-before 'check 'pre-check
+ (lambda _ (delete-file "tests/test_core.py")
+ #t)))))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("python-requests-mock" ,python-requests-mock)
+ ("python-mock" ,python-mock)))
+ (inputs
+ `(("python-oauthlib" ,python-oauthlib)
+ ("python-requests" ,python-requests)))
+ (home-page
+ "https://github.com/requests/requests-oauthlib")
+ (synopsis
+ "OAuthlib authentication support for Requests")
+ (description
+ "This package provides first-class OAuth library
+support for python-requests.")
+ (license isc)))
+
+(define-public python2-requests-oauthlib
+ (let ((base (package-with-python2 (strip-python2-variant python-requests-oauthlib))))
+ (package
+ (inherit base)
+ (native-inputs `(("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools)
+ ,@(package-native-inputs base))))))
+
--
2.7.3
From 5300fd89c45514077551eeceaede84139b127854 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dylan Jeffers <sapientech@openmailbox.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 12:29:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-pypump.
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pypump, python2-pypump): New
* variables.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index a7e5d42..465ee2b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -9895,3 +9895,42 @@ support for python-requests.")
(native-inputs `(("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools)
,@(package-native-inputs base))))))
+(define-public python-pypump
+ (package
+ (name "python-pypump")
+ (version "0.6")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump")
+ (commit "6b612a7ed3c5a9b0a0190f3999fcddb851d1900f")))
+ (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0xy9kw54a2dasc5jig1rmllwv6y3pngbw8pvi0yx2qfpswgr5qbg"))))
+ (build-system python-build-system)
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)))
+ (inputs
+ `(("python-requests" ,python-requests)
+ ("python-oauthlib" ,python-oauthlib)
+ ("python-requests-oauthlib" ,python-requests-oauthlib)
+ ("python-dateutil-2" ,python-dateutil-2)))
+ (home-page "https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump")
+ (synopsis "Python Pump.io library")
+ (description "PyPump is a simple but powerful and pythonic
+way of interfacing with the pump.io API.")
+ (license gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public python2-pypump
+ (let ((base (package-with-python2 (strip-python2-variant python-pypump))))
+ (package
+ (inherit base)
+ (inputs `(("python2-requests" ,python2-requests)
+ ("python2-oauthlib" ,python2-oauthlib)
+ ("python2-requests-oauthlib" ,python2-requests-oauthlib)
+ ("python2-pyasn1" ,python2-pyasn1)
+ ("python2-pyopenssl" ,python2-pyopenssl)
+ ("python2-ndg-httpsclient" ,python2-ndg-httpsclient)
+ ("python2-dateutil-2" ,python2-dateutil-2))))))
--
2.7.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-13 19:32 ` Dylan Jeffers
@ 2016-08-13 23:07 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-14 23:07 ` Dylan Jeffers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2016-08-13 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dylan Jeffers; +Cc: guix-devel
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:32:42PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> Thanks for getting back. Here is the series!
Cool, you showed me something new. I didn't know you could put the whole
series in a single attachment, apply it with `git am`, and have the
patch ordering handled automatically. Very nice :)
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add python-requests-oauthlib
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-requests-oauthlib,
> * python2-requests-oauthlib): New variables.
Somewhere in the re-creation of the patch series, this line was
forgotten:
+ #:use-module (gnu packages openstack)
I put it back in on my local branch.
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pypump, python2-pypump): New
> * variables.
How about putting this in gnu/packages/pumpio.scm? Seems appropriate to
me :)
> +(define-public python-pypump
> + (package
> + (name "python-pypump")
> + (version "0.6")
The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the latest
version in this case?
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PyPump/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-13 23:07 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2016-08-14 23:07 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-15 18:41 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Jeffers @ 2016-08-14 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: guix-devel
Hi Leo,
Yeah, following your advice, i used git format-patch -n master, but
then added --stdout > filename.patch to get a single file.
> How about putting this in gnu/packages/pumpio.scm? Seems appropriate
> to me :)
Was not aware of pumpio.scm, seems quite appropriate!
> The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the
> latest version in this case?
For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the version
used in my projects. Since the versions are quite different, maybe we
include both of them?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-14 23:07 ` Dylan Jeffers
@ 2016-08-15 18:41 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-15 22:17 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-15 22:29 ` Danny Milosavljevic
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2016-08-15 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dylan Jeffers; +Cc: guix-devel
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:07:11PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> > The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the
> > latest version in this case?
>
> For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the version
> used in my projects. Since the versions are quite different, maybe we
> include both of them?
I think we should package the latest version, at least.
Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6' that
inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
I'd prefer the latter option. I don't think we have a precedent of
adding old releases, although we do sometimes keep them around for
compatibility. But I could be mistaken.
What do people think we should do?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-15 18:41 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2016-08-15 22:17 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-19 22:17 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-15 22:29 ` Danny Milosavljevic
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dylan Jeffers @ 2016-08-15 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: guix-devel
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:41:28 -0400
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:07:11PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> > > The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the
> > > latest version in this case?
> >
> > For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the
> > version used in my projects. Since the versions are quite
> > different, maybe we include both of them?
>
> I think we should package the latest version, at least.
>
> Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6'
> that inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
> python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use
> GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
>
> I'd prefer the latter option. I don't think we have a precedent of
> adding old releases, although we do sometimes keep them around for
> compatibility. But I could be mistaken.
>
> What do people think we should do?
Yes I agree with the second alternative as well.
Dylan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-15 18:41 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-15 22:17 ` Dylan Jeffers
@ 2016-08-15 22:29 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2016-08-15 22:41 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-16 18:02 ` Leo Famulari
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Danny Milosavljevic @ 2016-08-15 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: guix-devel
> I think we should package the latest version, at least.
>
> Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6' that
> inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
> python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
It depends on whether pypump-0.6 is a major API-incompatible version that is still required by other Free Software packages in the wild on the internet. If so, it makes sense to carry it too. Otherwise not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-15 22:29 ` Danny Milosavljevic
@ 2016-08-15 22:41 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-16 18:02 ` Leo Famulari
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2016-08-15 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danny Milosavljevic; +Cc: guix-devel
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> > I think we should package the latest version, at least.
> >
> > Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6' that
> > inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
> > python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
>
> It depends on whether pypump-0.6 is a major API-incompatible version
> that is still required by other Free Software packages in the wild on
> the internet. If so, it makes sense to carry it too. Otherwise not.
That's a good point. But I don't see any pending packages on the list
that require pypump-0.6 ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-15 22:29 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2016-08-15 22:41 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2016-08-16 18:02 ` Leo Famulari
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2016-08-16 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danny Milosavljevic; +Cc: guix-devel
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:29:27AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> > I think we should package the latest version, at least.
> >
> > Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6' that
> > inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
> > python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
>
> It depends on whether pypump-0.6 is a major API-incompatible version
> that is still required by other Free Software packages in the wild on
> the internet. If so, it makes sense to carry it too. Otherwise not.
That would be a good reason to keep it. But so far, I haven't seen any
patches that would use it :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-15 22:17 ` Dylan Jeffers
@ 2016-08-19 22:17 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-05 9:21 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2016-08-19 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dylan Jeffers; +Cc: guix-devel
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:17:57PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:41:28 -0400
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:07:11PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> > > > The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the
> > > > latest version in this case?
> > >
> > > For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the
> > > version used in my projects. Since the versions are quite
> > > different, maybe we include both of them?
> >
> > I think we should package the latest version, at least.
> >
> > Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6'
> > that inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
> > python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use
> > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
> >
> > I'd prefer the latter option. I don't think we have a precedent of
> > adding old releases, although we do sometimes keep them around for
> > compatibility. But I could be mistaken.
> >
> > What do people think we should do?
>
> Yes I agree with the second alternative as well.
Okay, will you send a patch for it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
2016-08-19 22:17 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2016-09-05 9:21 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2016-09-05 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1691 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:17:47PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:17:57PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:41:28 -0400
> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:07:11PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> > > > > The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the
> > > > > latest version in this case?
> > > >
> > > > For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the
> > > > version used in my projects. Since the versions are quite
> > > > different, maybe we include both of them?
> > >
> > > I think we should package the latest version, at least.
> > >
> > > Maybe we could also package 0.6 with a package 'python-pypump-0.6'
> > > that inherits from python-pypump. Or, you could keep that inherited
> > > python-pypump-0.6 in a private package repo, and use
> > > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer the latter option. I don't think we have a precedent of
> > > adding old releases, although we do sometimes keep them around for
> > > compatibility. But I could be mistaken.
> > >
> > > What do people think we should do?
> >
> > Yes I agree with the second alternative as well.
>
> Okay, will you send a patch for it?
>
I tried to apply the original patch but it failed. Can you send an
updated patch set? I've also included the pypump-0.7 patch that I wrote.
I have no real way to test it, but maybe you do.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0002-gnu-Add-python-pypump.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2428 bytes --]
From 584228d422f8b3ddfda6f04486e1360d7b4820aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:00:25 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-pypump.
* gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (python-pypump): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
index a74d474..f834884 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@
#:use-module (guix download)
#:use-module (guix git-download)
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
+ #:use-module (guix build-system python)
#:use-module (gnu packages aspell)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages python)
#:use-module (gnu packages qt)
#:use-module (gnu packages web))
@@ -66,3 +68,40 @@
(description "Pumpa is a simple pump.io client written in C++ and Qt.")
(home-page "https://pumpa.branchable.com/")
(license gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public python-pypump
+ (package
+ (name "python-pypump")
+ (version "0.7")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (pypi-uri "PyPump" version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0100b8r76hwh4lbiwb2dji6jccpi4hgi2ns7qdgb3lwfidnya3ha"))))
+ (build-system python-build-system)
+ (arguments `(#:tests? #f)) ; FIXME: can't find test directory.
+ (inputs
+ `(("python-dateutil-2" ,python-dateutil-2)
+ ("python-requests" ,python-requests)
+ ("python-requests-oauthlib" ,python-requests-oauthlib)))
+ (home-page "https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump")
+ (synopsis "Python Pump.io library")
+ (description "Python Pump.io library")
+ (license gpl3+)
+ (properties `((python2-variant . ,(delay python2-pypump))))))
+
+(define-public python2-pypump
+ (let ((pypump (package-with-python2
+ (strip-python2-variant python-pypump))))
+ (package (inherit pypump)
+ (inputs
+ `(("python2-ndg-httpsclient" ,python2-ndg-httpsclient)
+ ("python2-pyasn1" ,python2-pyasn1)
+ ("python2-pyopenssl" ,python2-pyopenssl)
+ ,@(package-inputs pypump)))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("python2-mock" ,python2-mock)
+ ("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools)
+ ,@(package-native-inputs pypump))))))
--
2.10.0
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump.
2017-01-09 10:03 [PATCH 0/9] Add more qtmodules Efraim Flashner
@ 2017-01-09 10:03 ` Efraim Flashner
2017-01-09 11:03 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2017-01-09 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
* gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (python-pypump): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
index a74d474..f834884 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/pumpio.scm
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@
#:use-module (guix download)
#:use-module (guix git-download)
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
+ #:use-module (guix build-system python)
#:use-module (gnu packages aspell)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages python)
#:use-module (gnu packages qt)
#:use-module (gnu packages web))
@@ -66,3 +68,40 @@
(description "Pumpa is a simple pump.io client written in C++ and Qt.")
(home-page "https://pumpa.branchable.com/")
(license gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public python-pypump
+ (package
+ (name "python-pypump")
+ (version "0.7")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (pypi-uri "PyPump" version))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0100b8r76hwh4lbiwb2dji6jccpi4hgi2ns7qdgb3lwfidnya3ha"))))
+ (build-system python-build-system)
+ (arguments `(#:tests? #f)) ; FIXME: can't find test directory.
+ (inputs
+ `(("python-dateutil-2" ,python-dateutil-2)
+ ("python-requests" ,python-requests)
+ ("python-requests-oauthlib" ,python-requests-oauthlib)))
+ (home-page "https://github.com/xray7224/PyPump")
+ (synopsis "Python Pump.io library")
+ (description "Python Pump.io library")
+ (license gpl3+)
+ (properties `((python2-variant . ,(delay python2-pypump))))))
+
+(define-public python2-pypump
+ (let ((pypump (package-with-python2
+ (strip-python2-variant python-pypump))))
+ (package (inherit pypump)
+ (inputs
+ `(("python2-ndg-httpsclient" ,python2-ndg-httpsclient)
+ ("python2-pyasn1" ,python2-pyasn1)
+ ("python2-pyopenssl" ,python2-pyopenssl)
+ ,@(package-inputs pypump)))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("python2-mock" ,python2-mock)
+ ("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools)
+ ,@(package-native-inputs pypump))))))
--
2.10.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump.
2017-01-09 10:03 ` [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump Efraim Flashner
@ 2017-01-09 11:03 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2017-01-09 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 533 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:03:39PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> * gnu/packages/pumpio.scm (python-pypump): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/pumpio.scm | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
Ignore this one, I included it by accident, and I've never tested it.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-09 11:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-13 1:31 [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-13 12:57 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-13 19:32 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-13 23:07 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-14 23:07 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-15 18:41 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-15 22:17 ` Dylan Jeffers
2016-08-19 22:17 ` Leo Famulari
2016-09-05 9:21 ` Efraim Flashner
2016-08-15 22:29 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2016-08-15 22:41 ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-16 18:02 ` Leo Famulari
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-09 10:03 [PATCH 0/9] Add more qtmodules Efraim Flashner
2017-01-09 10:03 ` [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump Efraim Flashner
2017-01-09 11:03 ` Efraim Flashner
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).