From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib.
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:28:40 -0400
Message-ID: <20160815222840.GA10735@jasmine>
References: <8737m837zk.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160814172544.GA28736@jasmine>
	<87twengmbh.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87a8gexyrz.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87oa4ugsi4.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160815201528.GA23963@jasmine>
	<87a8gd22ug.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45232)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZQNM-0007Cy-6m
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:28:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZQNJ-0004l0-1M
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:28:56 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:34187)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bZQNH-0004fh-M0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:28:52 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a8gd22ug.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 09:29:11PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> > Running test_empirical_kernel_map / phase `check' failed after 2043.7 seconds 
> 
> Strange, I've built this dozens of times now with no test failures
> (GuixSD on amd64). Are you memory constrained by any chance? Any OOM or
> segfaults? I don't think the tests have taken more than ~15 minutes to
> run either, once they are built.

I don't think I'm particularly resource constrained. I have ~7 GiB RAM
available to build with, plenty of disk space, and the processor is this
thing:

http://ark.intel.com/products/64896/Intel-Core-i5-3320M-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-3_30-GHz

It appears to exit cleanly (no segfault or OOM).

It fails the same test on this machine as well as a slower x86_64
(Thinkpad x200s). One machine is Guix / Debian, the other is GuixSD.