From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dylan Jeffers Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:07:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20160814160711.5c87d31e@openmailbox.org> References: <20160812183129.0f76b28a@openmailbox.org> <20160813125700.GA12089@jasmine> <20160813123242.6162b166@openmailbox.org> <20160813230714.GA22289@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43755) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZ4VP-00077m-Jp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:07:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZ4VL-00040q-D9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:07:46 -0400 Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34]:51262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZ4VL-00040m-3U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:07:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160813230714.GA22289@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Leo, Yeah, following your advice, i used git format-patch -n master, but then added --stdout > filename.patch to get a single file. > How about putting this in gnu/packages/pumpio.scm? Seems appropriate > to me :) Was not aware of pumpio.scm, seems quite appropriate! > The latest upstream version 0.7. Is there a reason not to use the > latest version in this case? For my immediate purposes, I need pypump 0.6, since thats the version used in my projects. Since the versions are quite different, maybe we include both of them?