From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: gtk+: Add "bin" output.
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 21:51:07 -0500
Message-ID: <20160813215107.70e34fb5@openmailbox.org>
References: <20160806104616.13089-1-iyzsong@gmail.com>
	<20160814022153.GC28609@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43647)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1bYlWA-0004Ip-Dh
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:51:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1bYlW6-0002Gc-7r
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:51:17 -0400
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34]:59004)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1bYlW6-0002GO-1V
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:51:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160814022153.GC28609@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:21:53 -0400
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:12PM +0800, =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 wro=
te:
> > * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+)[outputs]: New field.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >=20
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
> > index 21365b9..5c42053 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
> > @@ -624,6 +624,7 @@ application suites.")
> >               (base32
> >                "157nh9gg0p2avw765hrnkvr8lsh2w811397yxgjv6q5j4fzz6d1q"))
> >              (patches (search-patches "gtk3-respect-GUIX_GTK3_PATH.patc=
h"))))
> > +   (outputs '("out" "bin" "doc"))
> >     (propagated-inputs
> >      `(("at-spi2-atk" ,at-spi2-atk)
> >        ("atk" ,atk) =20
>=20
> What effect does this have?
>=20
> Does Guix know to put something into the 'bin' output?

Yes, the gnu-build-system will automatically pass '--bindir' to
'configure' if a "bin" output is present.

However, should these outputs not instead be added to the 'gtk+-2'
package that 'gtk+' inherits from?

`~Eric