From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: core-updates merged! Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:49:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20160810194915.GA25076@jasmine> References: <20160801081958.GA2211@solar> <87lh0ggnyt.fsf@gnu.org> <87invje1yx.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87invj84bc.fsf@gnu.org> <20160802174821.GA29590@jasmine> <874m7297xg.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803040446.GA23535@jasmine> <20160806144222.GA3949@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXZVL-0008O1-K3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:49:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXZVG-0004nN-Fs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:49:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160806144222.GA3949@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 10:42:22AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > It was also suggested to cherry-pick the 11 commits from > core-updates-next onto master =E2=80=94 essentially rebasing them. I can = try > that if everyone is okay with me re-signing those commits. As discussed on #guix [0], I've pushed the result of this to WIP-core-updates [1]. I rewrote an obsolete curl update patch to instead remove the curl graft found on the master branch. Since this required me to re-sign these commits, will somebody please review the differences between WIP-core-updates and core-updates-next, to make sure I've done the right thing? When I get the "okay", I will rename the branch to core-updates, and then it will be "open for business" :) If all goes well, hopefully this is the last time we ever have to re-sign each other's work. [0] https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2016-08-10#T1099908 [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/log/?h=3DWIP-core-updates --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXq4UyAAoJECZG+jC6yn8I/B8P/2yKUQno9ywOkonSig8FHgEW CQ1u09Hu6wTkujVWAyey4jrm1SQvct5hbiKrRd03KxHEmdhTUhxNGg0U/wRy0cgD eg8GdM9bxe6WYLAIBxTQ8WFuqCTHNmHSxQq7JXugTL+SiN0+Fgc2EtjgNYIHppC8 TThQpDueqx0dVCNxLIudn7iL5s8IaM2uD3LuDSsdF72YN7Rn634XHPusD3qMql1d vDoOejpqhx1SCbxoO/0bbrpO0D8sHoM4qYcCpowC928D6bnKmabEFQHoA4shRM/d 7YCKwFNNyGUGDrcIavMv5o8O3lh5wU/X++w4+HooD9lkk9Chz7h7Z21KIYPKJacI yglvVU66X06CDNqTF6q5eCdTNrfjz/I8P8deIy9UbD9PLc+PsNME/rfz6B9t2BbQ MGC84zxUDR0Td0Jk4w5hT7J7+sZyjrzFrUJbBK8DObUniyy0zlxmedQR8MBWVyvK hVv7qQASNgB+mnWGp71zkaoJPHx+j4Ku+sK0P7e4rOpsWlrmLXOpzhqjTVRAf/U3 qX/3gsZBqs5E0O0eXB5sQhpXMss9TbeQxPMWVgRRx7dWJFLi5GW+OBRC8GhIUAbn 68kWjw+3hgycT/EzG2ZRsakaXZ6goyzeRr6c86wmfDe3+gyq5XGgO7zFli6oWBUK eTK21Hu7+rYHYa8kQl0+ =gqhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--