From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add python-pythondialog Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:56:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20160807025615.GA30934@jasmine> References: <87lh1hcp18.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160704180530.GB13592@jasmine> <871t39jlzw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <871t2fgvlk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87bn1ihzrf.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160802202103.GA4061@jasmine> <87vazhx82d.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWEGL-0004hU-Ts for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 22:56:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWEGH-0003No-QB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 22:56:28 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:38992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWEGG-0003Ng-JD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 22:56:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vazhx82d.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:16:42AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:53:15PM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote: > >> And actually the patch is wrong, I think it's missing a closing paren > >> for python2-pythondialog... > > > > I re-wrote it using the 'python2-variant' system, as attached. Does it > > work for you? > > > > I'm not sure if that's the right approach, but the resulting package for > > python2-pythondialog has the same result as before. What I mean is that > > I was able to download a substitute from Hydra for it, even with this > > new package definition. > > > > Also, I noticed that the Python 3 and Python 2 versions of this software > > tend to be released concurrently, so I made the Python 2 package take > > the version of the Python 3 package. Do you think that will work? > > Maybe.. I have no reference why I needed this in the first > place. PyBitmessage dependeny? I would say it works for me, but I don't > know exactly what the problem was outside of this thread. Okay, well I just pushed it as 1ae44b802 :) So we have it if we need it.