From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] services: Add spice vdagent service.
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:24:40 -0400
Message-ID: <20160805182440.GB14045@jasmine>
References: <20160802134531.19272-1-david@craven.ch>
	<20160802134531.19272-5-david@craven.ch>
	<CAL1_immF7rWGSHsieMmM1UFGb0h5c_=aPjSaSP5_N+uf3fwgwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160805181229.GA405@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39079)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bVjni-0004nt-Rt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:24:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bVjnf-0005Wo-Mn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:24:54 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:48722)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1bVjne-0005UX-D9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 14:24:51 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160805181229.GA405@solar>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, David Craven <david@craven.ch>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:12:29PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:33:03PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> > No comment means these patches are ok to merge?
> 
> Or that nobody looked at them? :-)
> Unfortunately I have no service expertise; hopefully someone else
> can have a look at this.

Likewise.