From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: core-updates merged! Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:14:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20160803221447.GA13977@jasmine> References: <20160802174821.GA29590@jasmine> <874m7297xg.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803040446.GA23535@jasmine> <871t253ith.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803172417.GA10236@jasmine> <878twd20ui.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803183911.GC11621@jasmine> <87vazhzknn.fsf@gnu.org> <20160803210129.GA4966@jasmine> <20160803212728.GB9172@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bV4RP-0004mM-B9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:15:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bV4RJ-0003gj-A2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:15:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160803212728.GB9172@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:27:28PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:01:29PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Do you mean `git checkout core-updates-next && git merge master`? That's > > what I've done. > > Another option would be the following: > git checkout master > git checkout -b core-updates > git cherry-pick "commit 1 from core-updates-next" > git cherry-pick "commit 2 from core-updates-next" > ... > > If there are only a dozen commits in core-updates-next, this could be > feasible, with the danger of forgetting some. I'm not sure if this is the right way to check, but $ git log --oneline master..core-updates-next | wc -l 161 Does anyone else want to test this? I just tried to copy the master branch and push it as TEMP-signature-test, and it was rejected by Savannah. Although, I didn't get any detail from Savannah about why it was rejected, which I did get when I tried to do it with core-updates-next earlier. So perhaps there is some other issue now...