From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 23:10:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20160803211025.GA9097@solar> References: <87lh0jf9fa.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87lh0ikl95.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160801222135.GA9924@solar> <877fbzh8ya.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <878twfzcnb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87fuqntg87.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87a8gvtcfj.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87popqxeh7.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bV3Qz-0001IH-5h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:10:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bV3Qs-0006jX-TV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:10:35 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:29567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bV3Qs-0006hq-EU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:10:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87popqxeh7.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel Hello, On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:45:56AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > I think the costs of maintaining a -svn of gnunet are too high at the > moment. I'm using these two packages as a base for debugging gnunet in > addition to gentoo to help work with upstream. > > A revision-less svn package does not work (unlike in gentoo), so my > focus is at the moment to help to push towards 0.10.2 release. that sounds like a good option, to make sure that the 0.10.2 release will work on Guix, and hopefully pass all its tests. Thanks for the work! Andreas