From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add awesome. Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:00:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20160731220013.GB28194@jasmine> References: <1465776755-16444-1-git-send-email-carlo@zancanaro.id.au> <1465992933-24389-1-git-send-email-carlo@zancanaro.id.au> <871t3xgvfx.fsf@gnu.org> <20160616234918.GA22378@jasmine> <87d1lt5vnq.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTymY-0002fw-HC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:00:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTymS-0005PS-JA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:00:25 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:49625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTymR-0005No-Cz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:00:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1lt5vnq.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Carlo Zancanaro On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:45:29PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:31:59AM +1000, Carlo Zancanaro wrote: > >> On 16 June 2016 at 22:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> > >> > Primarily, I built it with --rounds=2 as per > >> > < > >> > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html> > >> > ... > >> > > >> > >> I tried to build with --rounds=2, but always after I had built normally > >> (because I cared first about whether it compiled, then later about whether > >> it was deterministic). The --rounds=2 build never seemed to do anything. Is > >> there something I have to do to make that work? (I tried adding the --check > >> flag too, but it also seemed to not do anything, either with or without > >> --rounds.) > > > > Once you have built the package and it is in /gnu/store, you need to use > > --check. Reading back, I realize that we didn't talk about grafting. --check might not appear to have any effect if the package is grafted; in that case, you'd need to add --no-grafts.