From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion? Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:23:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20160726112342.GA4784@solar> References: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> <87twfcvftr.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS0Sn-0007gZ-5N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:23:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS0Sh-0007TG-75 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:23:52 -0400 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:56310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS0Sg-0007Sv-Pi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:23:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87twfcvftr.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:44:48AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > I would say we could keep "guix-devel" for patches and > discussions around them and create another list for discussion, > for example "guix-discuss". > No fix, but could help to separate patches and general > discussions. Notice we already have the help-guix mailing list (which admittedly does not serve the same purpose). Usually I mix them up anyway, since they appear in the same mailbox for me... Andreas