From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: nss-certs: Stop inheriting from nss package. Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:39:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20160718193940.GB31455@jasmine> References: <20160718115941.17707-1-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <20160718115941.17707-2-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <20160718163927.GA2347@jasmine> <877fci211h.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPEOS-0002N5-6M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:39:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPEON-0002bM-Uj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:39:55 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:49636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPEOM-0002ai-Kd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:39:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877fci211h.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:34:18PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:59:39PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> * gnu/packages/certs.scm (nss-certs): Stop inheriting from nss package. > > > > Why do we want to do this? > > > > It appears to me that the resulting package would be the same. Is there > > a plan to let the versions diverge in the future? > > We have a module cycle when using the certs module from the java > module. By separating “nss-certs” from the “nss” package we break the > cycle. Ludo explained it well in this email: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-06/msg00648.html > > >> +;;; Copyright © 2016 Ludovic Courtès > > > > Is this intentional? > > Yes. This patch is almost exactly the same as what Ludo proposed in the > email above. I cannot take credit for this. Ah, thanks for explaining!